Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(11): 7406-7411, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257313

ABSTRACT

Aim: Stigma is a well-documented impediment to health-seeking behaviors and treatment adherence. An explicit societal understanding is essential to halt the stigmatization. Studies documented COVID-19-associated stigma among healthcare personnel. However, there is little evidence regarding community perceptions and experiences of the stigma associated with COVID-2019. We described how various communities perceive and experience the stigma associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: We conducted a phenomenological study in three districts of Madhya Pradesh, with both urban and rural areas. We conducted 36 in-depth phone interviews. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed, and translated into English and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Two major themes were derived: 1) experiences of coronavirus disease 2019 recovered individuals and community members on discrimination and stigma, and 2) efforts to reduce coronavirus disease 2019-associated discrimination and stigma. Social support is critical in mitigating the adverse effects of stigma and thereby aiding in preventing disease spread. They express gratitude to the local government for moral support. Although activities involving information, education, and communication may be beneficial in reducing the stigma associated with COVID 2019, the mass media have a critical role. Conclusions: The multidisciplinary teams comprising medical, social, and behavioral scientists and communication and media experts should be formed to reduce the risk of ambiguous messages and misinformation related to COVID-19 at primary care at the community level. Furthermore, it is vital for anti-stigma orientation among community members via mass media.

2.
Glob Health Action ; 16(1): 2133723, 2023 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2187583

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Community engagement and involvement (CEI) was crucial for the COVID-19 pandemic response, particularly among the urban poor in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, no evidence synthesis explores how CEI can benefit public health emergencies. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic scoping review of the CEI with an emphasis on stakeholder identification, accountability mapping, the support system, and the engagement process among urban poor populations in LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We searched eleven databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL, following the PRISMA-2020 guidelines to find articles published between November 2019 and August 2021. PROSPERO registration No: CRD42021283599. We performed the quality assessment using a mixed-method appraisal tool. We synthesized the findings using thematic framework analysis. RESULTS: We identified 6490 records. After the title and abstract screening, 133 studies were selected for full-text review, and finally, we included 30 articles. Many stakeholders were involved in COVID-19 support, particularly for health care, livelihoods, and WASH infrastructure, and their accountability mapping by adopting an interest - influence matrix. This review emphasizes the significance of meaningful CEI in designing and implementing public health efforts for pandemic management among urban slum populations. The interest - influence matrix findings revealed that specific community volunteers, community-based organizations, and civil society organizations had high interest but less influence, indicating that it is necessary to recognize and engage them. CONCLUSION: Motivation is crucial for those with high influence but less interest, such as corporate responsibility/conscience and private food supply agencies, for the health system's preparedness plan among urban populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Developing Countries , Humans , Pandemics , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Community Participation
3.
Int J Public Health ; 67: 1604348, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2055114

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic containment necessitated the diversion of substantial health care resources thus affecting the routine essential care, and posing barriers to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We explored the experiences of vulnerable communities-urban-slum-dwelling women regarding maternal and child health services during COVID-19. Methods: We conducted 48 in-depth interviews in four Indian states-12 in each state among urban-slum antenatal, intra-natal, and postnatal women. We used framework analysis. Results: Amidst the implementation of the mandatory stay-at-home, many women acknowledged that routine immunization services and antenatal check-ups remained uninterrupted, and were mostly provided at the community level. To prevent transmission, the family members and relatives had restricted visits to the health facility during labor or post-delivery. Women preferred to have a shorter hospital stay post-delivery and reduced routine postnatal check-ups for fear of infection. Conclusion: India has a variety of national and state-level programs focused on improving MCH indicators to achieve the SDGs. COVID-19 inadvertently interrupted some components of health services, insinuating the need for a disaster or pandemic-resilient MCH services delivery system.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child Health Services , Maternal Health Services , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Pandemics , Poverty Areas , Pregnancy
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(19)2022 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2043702

ABSTRACT

Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) among urban poor women is a major urban policy concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There was a paucity of systematic information on WASH among the urban poor during the pandemic. We reviewed the opportunities and challenges faced by the urban poor in LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the PRISMA guidelines to conduct a comprehensive search of 11 databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL, between November 2019 and August 2021. We used thematic analysis to synthesize the qualitative data and meta-analyses to estimate the pooled prevalence. We screened 5008 records, conducted a full-text review of 153 studies, and included 38 studies. The pooled prevalence of shared water points was 0.71 (95% CI 0.37-0.97), non-adherence to hygiene practices was 0.15 (95% CI 0.08-0.24), non-adherence to face masks was 0.27 (95% CI 0.0-0.81), and access to shared community toilets was 0.59 (95% CI 0.11-1.00). Insufficient facilities caused crowding and long waiting times at shared facilities, making physical distancing challenging. Women reported difficulty in maintaining privacy for sanitation, as men were present due to the stay-at-home rule. Due to unaffordability, women reported using cloth instead of sanitary pads and scarves instead of masks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sanitation , COVID-19/epidemiology , Developing Countries , Female , Humans , Hygiene , Male , Pandemics , Water , Water Supply
5.
PLoS One ; 17(5): e0268106, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1833663

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ensuring accessible and quality health care for women and children is an existing challenge, which is further exacerbated during pandemics. There is a knowledge gap about the effect of pandemics on maternal, newborn, and child well-being. This systematic review was conducted to study maternal and child health (MCH) services utilization during pandemics (Zika, Ebola, and COVID-19) and the effectiveness of various interventions undertaken for ensuring utilization of MCH services. METHODOLOGY: A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Epistemonikos, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Of 5643 citations, 60 potential studies were finally included for analysis. The included studies were appraised using JBI Critical appraisal tools. Study selection and data extraction were done independently and in duplicate. Findings are presented narratively based on the RMNCHA framework by World Health Organization (WHO). RESULTS: Maternal and child health services such as antenatal care (ANC) visits, institutional deliveries, immunization uptake, were greatly affected during a pandemic situation. Innovative approaches in form of health care services through virtual consultation, patient triaging, developing dedicated COVID maternity centers and maternity schools were implemented in different places for ensuring continuity of MCH care during pandemics. None of the studies reported the effectiveness of these interventions during pandemic-related health emergencies. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that during pandemics, MCH care utilization often gets affected. Many innovative interventions were adopted to ensure MCH services. However, they lack evidence about their effectiveness. It is critically important to implement evidence-based appropriate interventions for better MCH care utilization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Maternal Health Services , Maternal-Child Health Services , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child Health , Emergencies , Female , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pandemics , Pregnancy
6.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 9(7)2021 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1295810

ABSTRACT

Maternal and child health (MCH) has been a global priority for many decades and is an essential public health service. Ensuring seamless delivery is vital for desirable MCH outcomes. This systematic review outlined the challenges in accessing and continuing MCH services during public health emergencies-pandemics and disasters. A comprehensive search approach was built based on keywords and MeSH terms relevant to 'MCH services' and 'pandemics/disasters'. The online repositories Medline, CINAHL, Psyc INFO, and Epistemonikos were searched for studies. We included twenty studies-seven were on the Ebola outbreak, two on the Zika virus, five related to COVID-19, five on disasters, and one related to conflict situations. The findings indicate the potential impact of emergencies on MCH services. Low utilization and access to services have been described as common challenges. The unavailability of personal safety equipment and fear of infection were primary factors that affected service delivery. The available evidence, though limited, indicates the significant effect of disasters and pandemics on MCH. However, more primary in-depth studies are needed to understand better the overall impact of emergencies, especially the COVID-19 pandemic, on MCH. Our synthesis offers valuable insights to policymakers on ensuring the uninterrupted provision of MCH services during an emergency.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL